英语观后感标题
英语观后感标题
英语观后感标题：当幸福来敲门英文观后感范文
This is about movie review.Yes,this is The Pursuit Of Happyiness.
Because our teacher demand us finish the movie review.—— Foreword
In fact,I have seen this movie before class.I frist met it when I was a senior middle school student.But I have get more impressions then before.
In the movie,the leading role of The Pursuit Of Happyiness,Jefferson's Declaration of independence words about happyiness kept recurring to Chris Gardner.Chris hardly work from everyday morning to night,but still couldn't make a charge.At last,his wife can't endured and left away,just leaving him and their five-year-old son.That is to say,Chris become a single father.
Even worse is,Chris no money to pay for the rent.And he was failed with his career.They become homeless.They slept in anywhere.But Chris never gave up,just for his son and his belief.He still strongly believed that happyiness would come one day if he worked hard enough.
At last of the film,Chris was succeed.But everyone know that too diffcult and hardly.
I think everyone know this is a inspired story.And I'm moved.But in this movie,the most impress me are two things about Chris's love to his son and his strong faith towards life.After that,I learn one thing that if a person has a strong faith in himself,nothing will impossible.
英语观后感标题：《蜘蛛侠》英文观后感
Tonight I watched the movie for the third time. I really enjoy this film so much.
So what's your choice between being a common person or a hero with people's respects? Most people will choose the latter. But what will be your choice if the cost is laying your lover among the risks? What will it be if the cost is you can never tell the girl, who you love so much, that you love her? The spider man had this contradiction. But finally he still chose the latter, not in order to be a hero, but to make this word peaceful.
I was so moved by the words the Aunt Mary said:
You will never guess what he wants to be, the spider man. He knows the hero when he sees one, too a few characters out there, flying all around out there, saving old girls like me. Lord knows kids like Henry need hero courageous, sacrificing for people, setting examples for all of us. Everybody loves a hero. People enthrone them, cheer them, scream their names and years later they will tell how they stood in the rain for hours just to get a glimpse the one who taught them to hold on to stand longer. I believe there is a hero in all of us. They keep us be honest, give us strength, make us noble, and finally allow us to die with proud. Ever though sometimes we have to initiatively give up the thing we want most, even our dreams. Spider man did that for Henry, so he wants to know where he is gone. He needs him.
The spider man got much from these words, so did I. And what about you? what's the hero lying in you?
英语观后感标题：阿甘正传英语观后感
After finishing appreciating the film “Forrest Gump” ,I lost in deeply thought…
“Life is just like vairous pieces of chocolates that you'll never know which one belongs to you”.It means that the orbits of men are quite different besides Gump.
From studying in special school to play ball well,being a hero of Vietnam War,being the capital of the lobster ship ,running all over the USA.Forrest Gump achieved success what other normal people admire.
Although he was a physical disabled man when he was a little child,classmates often laugh at him,but he didn't bend to the unjustice,active living attitude broughe him his first miracle that his broken legs got well which is unbelieveble.Gump joinedthearmy and was assigned to Vienam.
When he was an adule,oneday,his teammates and him were surrounded by enemies,though Gump was the first people run away from the circle,the friendship made him get back andsave lots of his teammates.He was considered as a hero.It is his second miracle.
The whole life of Forrest Gump emerge lots of miracles which results from his brave and unafraid.We should learn the truth of life from him and use it to make our life wonderful.
英语观后感标题：《泰坦尼克号》观后感(英文)
I suppose there's something faintly ridiculous about a $200-million movie that argues on behalf of true love over wealth and even bandies about a precious diamond as a central narrative device--like Citizen Kane's Rosebud--to clinch its point. Yet for all the hokeyness, Titanickept me absorbed all 194 minutes both times I saw it. It's nervy as well as limited for writer-director-coproducer James Cameron to reduce a historical event of this weight to a single invented love story, however touching, and then to invest that love story with plot details that range from unlikely to downright stupid. But one clear advantage of
paring away the subplots that clog up disaster movies is that it allows one to achieve a certain elemental purity.
This movie tells you a great deal about first class on the ship, a little bit about third class, and nothing at all about second class.According to Walter Lord's 1955 nonfiction book about the sinking of the Titanic, A Night to Remember, which includes a full passenger list, 279 of the 2,223 passengers were in second class, and 112 of them survived.
But as far as Cameron's story is concerned--a love match between a footloose and penniless artist in third class, Jack Dawson (Leonardo DiCaprio), and a rebellious protofeminist woman in first class, Rose DeWitt Bukater (Kate Winslet), who's engaged to marry an unscrupulous zillionaire (Billy Zane)-- the omission makes perfect sense, even though it establishes that there's no middle ground between the lovers. To speak about the artistry of Titanic rather than its economics is to assume that the audience's pleasure counts for more than the investors'bank accounts--hardly the assumption that rules the current discourse about the movie. The five-page spread in the December 8 issue of Time magazine includes over three pages devoted to hand-wringing in the lead article, which is headlined "Was all the misery worth it?" That's
followed by Richard Corliss's negative review, which occupies only two-thirds of one page and concludes, "Ultimately, Titanic will sail or sink not on its budget but on its merits as drama and spectacle. The regretful verdict here: Dead in the water." Then Cameron is allotted a final page to defend himself, though the obsession with the bottom line in the preceding onslaught forces him to devote nearly all of his rebuttal to production and business details rather than aesthetics. The package could easily have appeared in Forbes, Fortune, or Variety. Yet whose money and whose interests are actually inspiring all thisnervousness? Considering the amount of abuse that this movie dishes out to the privileged first-class passengers, isn't it possible that this is what really has Time so hot and bothered?
I saw Titanic twice at the same theater--first with an audience of "industry people," including other reviewers, then a couple of weeks later with a less professional crowd--and the difference in the audible responses was palpable. I enjoyed the movie both times, but the second screening, unlike the first, was punctuated by gasps, laughs, and applause in all the right places, suggesting that the second crowd,which had only its own interests at stake, was a lot more receptive.It's as if I'd sat the first time with the ship's owners and the second time with the passengers.
Morally and conceptually, this movie could almost have been made in 1912, the year the Titanic sank and the year that D.W. Griffith made Man's Genesis, The Musketeers of Pig Alley, and The NewYork Hat. I hasten to add that this was still three years before The Birth of a Nation, the picture that established features as the central attraction of moviegoing, and that there's nothing about Kate Winslet that suggests either Lillian Gish or Mary Pickford. (If her pulchritude and sass recall any silent actress of the teens, it might be Theda Bara.)
Moreover, when Cameron resorts to Griffith-like crosscutting to build momentum, he's hamstrung by his wide-screen format, which is less amenable to fast cutting than the screen ratio Griffith had to work with, and by the wealth of visual details (such as crowds and fixtures) he has to coordinate; even Cameron's 1989 The Abyss, which worked with a simpler game plan, has better suspense sequences than this movie.
But in terms of narrative streamlining and moral simplicity, Titanic is still a lot closer to Griffith and his era than it is to other 90s disaster films. The characterizations of heroes and villains, which appear to be drawn with the utmost sincerity, all seem cut from the same Victorian cloth as those in Griffith's melodramas--among others, there's the dreamy and selfless Irish-American artist-adventurer, the tempestuous and freethinking Philadelphia debutante, the snarling and brutal zillionaire fiance (with an improbable touch of Brando's Stanley Kowalski), and the fiance's sadistic and preying valet (David Warner).
For better and for worse, this is a movie that appears to believe in what it's saying--and the lack of cynicism is refreshing.
【英语观后感标题】相关文章：
1.观后感标题
2.观后感英文标题
3.观后感小标题
4.观后感标题格式
5.电影观后感标题
6.观后感正副标题
7.观后感主副标题
8.观后感标题怎么写